Batch processed about 100 files in Dxo and had to reprocess many of them in Denoise. But upon extensive use I have found that Denoise gives me better results using Clear, High, High option. Topaz DenoiseĪ few more fullsize samples: DXO DeepPrime vs. There is a link to the dropbox with all the samples (81 files in total):ĭXO HQ vs.
Here you can find a set of full-size images (range from ISO64 - ISO25.600) comparing DXO (with different noise reductions: HQ-Fast - Prime - DeepPrime with Topaz Denoise): Often the Topaz Denoise results look unnatural to me In my tests, DXO DeepPrime was always superior to Topaz Denoise. 4x faster than the processing in Topaz Denoiseģ. On my setup with older mid-range graphics card (GeForce 1060GTX), the export in DXO (using GPU) is ca. Since Topaz only does denoise, you still need another program for the restĢ. My take (only comparing DeepPrime functionality vs Topas Denoise)ġ. What are thoughts after some (post the 3 week trial period!) use?Īs the others said, DXO is a complete RAW converter (one feature is DeepPrime), Topaz Denoise only does noise reduction. Choice between Topaz DeNoise AI vs DxO PhotoLab 4 DeepPRIME - does anyone have any thoughts which one is better?ĭoes one have weaknesses the other patches?
0 kommentar(er)
